Final Cut Pro is designed to be an entry-level professional-quality post-production video editor. Here are the benefits which come from using this platform.ġ. It is a professional-quality editing solution that can be used to create consistent, high-quality results for videos that are meant for public consumption in some way.Īt the time of this comparison, Final Cut Pro is available through the App Store for $299.99. For those looking for a simple way to create personal videos, this platform should not be the first choice. What Are the Benefits of Final Cut Pro?įinal Cut Pro should be considered a professional-level video editing tool. Here are the points of comparison to review when looking for an answer to the Final Cut Pro vs iMovie debate. It is a simplified solution for video editing, however, so those looking for a platform with more power might consider Final Cut Pro.
Both offer post-production benefits that can be useful to certain users, creating professional-quality videos from the comfort and convenience of home.Īs an added benefit, iMovie is often included in the base software package which comes with Apple computers and devices.
Both programs allow a trial period ( Adobe/ Final Cut), so if you have a Mac, give ’em both a shot. It will become pretty apparent to you which one is a better fit for your workflow. The only way you can really get to know both programs is actually editing a project in both. Are you a seasoned editor who wants a traditional NLE with the backing power of the Adobe Suite? Then Premiere is a solid bet. Are you a new editor who prefers a simple layout that can perform pro functions without too much hassle? Then Final Cut may be your choice. So obviously, this is going to come down to personal preference when deciding between the two. Let’s go into what the current iteration of Final Cut has to offer you, as well as its drawbacks. Over the past decade, Apple put in a lot of work to try and grab back their corner of the market share. They released Final Cut X, which at the time cut out a lot of the features and recognizable UX that Final Cut 7 offered in the name of “innovation.” This angered a lot of editors, who suddenly and loudly moved over to Premiere to do their editing. But, in 2011, Apple execs made a bold choice. When I started out in my editing career way back in 2008, I first learned non-linear editing through Final Cut 7. It was even used as the chosen NLE for the Coen Brother’s production of True Grit. When Final Cut 7 was released in 2007 to compete with Avid Media Composer, it quickly became the indie darling NLE. Let’s dive in!įinal Cut has been either sitting comfortably on the top of the industry standard or slumped down in the lower rungs for the past two decades. Today, we are going to take a dive into each program, what strengths they have to offer, as well as the weaknesses they present. While the market share has lost its majority to NLE’s such as DaVinci Resolve and the industry titan Avid Media Composer, the overwhelming choice for your common editor will boil down to Adobe Premiere and Final Cut.īut who is right? Who is wrong? Well, as with all choices, it matters on what you use it for.
The top market share position has ebbed and flowed between both programs due to updates on both sides of the aisle, and frequent shifts in what editors prefer at the time. It’s been the subject of heated bar debates and post-production meetups since the advent of the two programs - Final Cut or Premiere? Both Mac-heads and die-hard Adobe fans have battled it out for the better part of two decades with this argument. Final Cut and Premiere Pro have been battling for the top spot in editors’ hearts for the past decade.